Ron Manners’ ideas and adventures
Read more
Photo of Ron Manners

“The right to acquire property is enumerated in many, if not all, of the State constitutions as one of the natural, inherent rights of men — one that is not surrendered to government — but which government has no power to infringe —one which government is bound to respect and secure.” Lysander Spooner 

Mannwest private propertyGovernment control of property continues to be an issue in Western Australia with a number of farmers risking loss of both land and livelihood under ridiculous government legislation.

Environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) are declared by the Minister for Environment under section 51B of the Environmental Protection Act 1986. There is a huge number of ESAs in this state – according to government reports there are 98,042 parcels of land that are not Crown Reserves or State Forest which include an ESA. The exact number is sketchy but if you want to check your own property, the location of ESAs can be viewed online using Landgate’s Shared Land Information Platform (SLIP).

Legislation states that a permit must be granted to clear any native vegetation from an ESA. All wetlands and much of Western Australia’s prime agricultural land have been identified by government as ESAs. To make matters worse, many graziers are unaware of ESA boundaries on their land and say they weren’t consulted on the legislation (which was enacted in 2005). It’s estimated the legislation affects 3,000 to 4,000 WA farmers.

This is a case of government control, pure and simple. I’ve written previously on property rights. This is not a new problem we’re facing but the consequences beyond anything we’ve seen before. In 1976 I wrote a paper on the increasing power government had in zoning land. In it I questioned the balance of ownership between the individual and the state. I also pointed out that basic human freedom was to be impacted if ownership shifted too far towards government.

Mannwest_property_rightsThere may be as many as 5000 farms affected by ESA declaration. Take Manjimup farmer Peter Swift. He was charged by the Department of Environment and Conservation in 2009 for removing native vegetation. How did they determine this? Through satellite monitoring of his property. Although acquitted, half his 1200-acre property is now ‘environmentally sensitive’ and cannot be used.

He faced legal fees and losses of $360,000. He also owes a hefty mortgage on the farm. Sadly, the long battle for Peter may soon be over. The bank has also valued his property without acknowledging the fact that only half of it is allowed to be farmed. How does this make sense?

Although government is looking to repeal the legislation that stops him using his land, this is not happening quickly enough.A petition was put forward to the Legislative Council of WA in August 2015. Government responsed to the petition by noting that the Act was “criticized for its complexity” and for “focusing on process rather than outcomes”. Government also stated it was looking at alternative methods but two years later have still not worked anything out.

Although the government is reviewing changes to the Act, these may come too late for WA farmers like Peter who are just trying to make a buck in an already difficult market.

 

 

 

1 Comment

  • Terry EALING says:

    At present a group of us are hoping to place a petition before the Legislative Council regarding many Government Agencies and Corporations not disclosing any encumbrances or property interests on any freehold fee simple land under the Torrens System. The greatest example of this and what it causes was in the case of Peter Swift, Farmer from Manjimup which the bank has for closed on. The unknown E.S.A. cause him not to be able to farm about 430 Hectares of his 486 hectare property to the point he could not produce enough income to service his loan repayment. We are proposing a number of ways that this should be prevented from happening which it can with many other Government Agencies such as Western Power, D.E.C or Telstra to name a few. It seems that the Government has continued on making decisions without consulting Landowners or making information available to prospective buyers.The problem is that no one knows these interests in properties exist and of course the Government bodies do not wish to disclose them to the community as no one would ever buy land. We would appreciate any help and support that you can give as we are amateurs believe me. This is claimed to be in the public’s interest which we refute. It is time for disclosure to the extent of how much our ownership of properties is challenged by these Government bodies as you will all be amazed. It is time for change!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *