skip to content

Ron Manners’ ideas
and adventures
Read More

This year’s Mont Pelerin Society meeting in Iceland [August 2005] held many fascinations for this Australian member. Firstly, there is the remarkably inverse relationship between Australia and Iceland, whereas Australia at the beginning of the 20th century had the highest living standard in the world, Iceland was possibly the poorest nation in Western Europe.

But at the end of the 20th century Austrlaia had fallen to 16th place, whilst Iceland had risen to be vying for the top spot. The reasons for this warrant close study in the light of the current situation where, despite Australia’s abundance of natural resources, combined with record export prices, we are not winning the battle at balancing our financial books.

The dazzling array of Presidents, Prime Ministers and revered economists at the Iceland meeting guaranteed a high level of debate and as the speakers were protected by Chatham House rules, with their papers made available to members only. Presenters’ permission is required prior to any external reporting. In some cases this was granted and by courtesy of The Brussels Journal you can access these Mont Pelerin Society “samplers”. They offer:

Success stories flowed freely and a common thread through so many was the ease and success following the rapid adoption of flat rate tax.

Flat rate tax

Apart from reference to the above paper, the former Estonian Prime Minister, Mart Laar, modestly commented that his being an historian, rather than an economist, was good for Estonia as one of the first things he did when being elected Prime Minister was to ask for a good book on economics, so he could gain some ideas on how to get their stagnant economy moving.

Someone gave him a copy of Free to Choose, by Milton and Rose Friedman. Among the many ideas he gained from this book was the benefits gained by instantly moving to a flat rate tax system instead of the Marxist-Leninist system of escalating taxes that have unfortunately decimated so many western economies. Mr Laar modestly stated that the idea was so appealing and simple he didn’t realize that he was the European pioneer of introducing such a tax.

It has proved to be extremely successful. When they introduced it in 1994 at a flat rate of 26 per cent, it enabled them to enjoy rapid economic growth and pay off Estonia’s national debt. Consequently they are now cutting the rate to 20 per cent.

Even Vladimir Putin’s [former] Chief Economic Advisor, Andrei N Illarionov admitted that Russia’s moves to a 13 per cent flat rate tax is the best thing they have done and people now are actually paying their taxes, and on time too! Eleven countries in Europe have now activated their economies by moving to a flat rate tax system and it is like snowball in motion. This flat rate tax revolution is getting larger as it quickly rolls from country to country, where competition ensures that the best ideas win.

Australia must choose quickly, to either compete or turn our back on the benefits that will accrue from bulldozing our unwieldy and uncompetitive tax system to one side.

If you wish to know just how unwieldy, uncompetitive and particularly costly Australia’s tax system is, read Dr Alex Robson’s CIS paper The Costs of Taxation or Shrinking the Tax Code, Growing Liberty by Daniel J Mitchel. The Guardian article Tories to Consider Flat Tax Rate by Matthew Tempest will also give you some background.

Mart Laar Mannwest

Former Estonian Prime Minister, Mart Laar, second from right, at Mont Pelerin Society 2005.


1 Comment

  • A Flat Tax is clearly the way to go. But a Flat Tax on what? The only time anything has a monetary value is at the moment when a Buyer and a Seller agree that price in the agreed currency. A moment later the item traded may command a different price. A Flat Tax on the trade has many advantages, and can be remarkably low. Marxist ideas of ‘from each according to ability – to each according to need’ have resulted in a nightmare of discrimination, giving political power to people who make the most populist promises in determining who is needy and who is able. The time wasted in chasing the elusive concept called ‘profit’ in order to penalise it, is a dreadful burden on the productive members of society. Differentiating between individuals and groups of individuals (companies) also requires nonsensical rules and regulations. If you want less of something, tax it more. So we wonder why unemployment is so high – PAYE taxes, Payroll Taxes, Superannuation Taxes, Compliance costs … it’s a no brainer. A simple, predictable, broad-based, low tax on the exchange of ownership of goods, services, property and labour will restore Motivation and clean the barnacles from the ship of state.
    With apologies to John, Paul, Ringo and George
    Imagine when you go home
    Making things you’ve made
    Knowing that your taxes
    Are paid as you trade.
    Imagine that your efforts
    All belong to you
    And to those you care for
    Under rules you knew.
    You-oo-ooh, you may say I’m a dreamer
    But I’m not the only one
    Taxes fair and simple
    Will leave some time, for fun.

Leave a Reply